Table of Contents
- Chapter 1: Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
- Chapter 2: The Sounds of Silence
- Chapter 3: Wanted Dead or Alive
- Chapter 4: We are the Champions
- Chapter 5: Old Man
- Chapter 6: Money
- Chapter 7: I Will Always Love You
- Chapter 8: Crime of the Century
- Closing Arguments
Where it All Started
Edmund Broder harvested the Broder Buck on November 26, 1926.
Edmund Broder married Hazel Bailey on February 2, 1927.
The Broder Buck was pronounced the World Record Non-Typical Mule Deer by the Boone & Crockett Club in 1962.
Hazel Broder passed away in 1967, and her daughters claimed her personal effects.
Edmund Broder passed away on December 26, 1968, and his sons claimed his personal effects.
Richard Broder kept the 1914 Model T.
Earl Broder took an oxblood saddle and blacksmith equipment.
George Broder took some hunting gear and a rifle.
Then in 1970, Donald Broder took his father’s deer head mount.
The Broder Buck.
Then, in July of 1997,
Richard Broder, Earl Broder, George Broder, Margaret Broder MacPhee, Doris Broder Bibaud, and Luella Broder Adams all sued Donald Broder and Craig Broder for the return of the Broder Buck.
All Donald Broder requested was that an Application for Probate be filed at the Surrogate Court of Edmonton, Alberta, to formally appoint personal representatives who would have legal standing to make demands for the recovery of all
of Edmund Broder’s personal effects.
Donald Broder and Craig Broder believed they had a strong statute of limitations defence, because it had been almost 30 years since Edmund’s passing. Had an administrator been appointed, that personal representative would have been
required to demand that all siblings return all of Edmund Broder’s personal property, not just the Broder Buck that Donald Broder had held in his exclusive possession since 1970.
Alberta Rules of Court, Rule 129, was therefore pleaded in the Statement of Defence: “[t]he action is frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process,” because the Broder siblings had no legal or equitable right to sue for the property
in question.
Is this just another Canadian government injustice?
This website will provide factual evidence, drawn from court-filed documents and transcripts, exposing conspiracy to orchestrate the outcome, for the purpose of defrauding the Defendant’s, obstruction of justice, fraud on the courts all by willful actions of the Crown in right of Alberta, Canada for all whom were acting in collusion with all the lawyers involved.
This website will prove beyond any reasonable doubt how The Alberta Justice Department was troubled by the fact that the plaintiffs’ lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen forced the pleadings closed by way of a formal court order on herself before applying for probate and appointing personal representatives, as the original Plaintiffs as they were named on the Statement of Claim had no legal standing to sue for property they had no legal or equitable right for only a personal representative can bring an action on behalf of a deceased.
It will further demonstrate how the Alberta Justice Department acted in a biased and prejudicial manner, conspiring with lawyers to jail, frame, and defraud the defendants, Donald Broder and Craig Broder, in order to benefit
their legal associates financially by misappropriating the estate of Edmund Broder.