Hazel Broder passed away in 1967 and her daughters claimed her personal affects.
Edmund Broder passed away on December 26, 1968 and his sons claimed his personal affects.
Richard Broder kept the 1914 Model T.
Earl Broder took an Ox Blood saddle and blacksmith equipment.
George Broder took some hunting gear and a rifle.
Donald Broder took his father’s deer head trophy, the “Broder Buck.”
Then, in 1997, they all sued Donald Broder and Craig Broder for the return of the Trophy Buck.
~
All Donald Broder requested was that an Application for an Administrator be appointed at The Surrogate Court, Edmonton, Alberta. Donald Broder and Craig Broder believed they had a strong Statute of Limitation Defence, because it was
almost 30 years since Edmunds passing. If an Administrator would have been appointed, then that representative demand that all siblings return all of Edmund Broder personal property—not just The Trophy Buck that Donald
Broder had in his possession.
So, Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 was plead in the Statement of defence: “[t]he action is frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of process” because the Broder siblings had no right to sue for property they have no legal or equitable
right to.
Is this just another Canadian Government crime?
This website will provide factual evidence of The Crown and lawyers involved with all referenced Court filed documents and transcripts that The Alberta Justice Department was upset because the Plaintiff’s lawyer forced the pleadings
close within this action before she had applied for Probate, and as such the Plaintiff’s had no standing to sue. Then prove how. The Alberta Justice Department acted biased and prejudiced conspiring with lawyers to jail, frame, and
defraud the Defendants. Donald Broder and Craig Broder.