911 – The Buck For Justice website provides conclusive evidence of Judicial Fraud committed by The Alberta and Federal Justice Department of Canada. Justices of the Court conspire to orchestrate the outcome and falsely incarcerate an innocent, vulnerable senior citizen, Donald H. Broder and threaten his family. Then while being falsely incarcerated at The Edmonton Remand Centre, lawyers colluded to manipulate and extort $225,000.00 from Donald H Broder's wife Joyce M Broder for whom was in the early stages of Dementia to secure his release. Then Donald Broder's criminal Lawyer Marvin Bloos from Beresh, Depoe Cunninham in Edmonton, Alberta orchestrate The Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada to assist Alberta Justice in concealing the criminal activity that was being committed by Alberta Justice, The Attorney General Alison Redford and lawyers here in Alberta, Canada from; The Supreme Court of Canada. Warning 11 hour -11day -11 month of 2018 signifies 100 years since the end of The First World
Now that you Alison Redford are Premier of Alberta
So when you have to write a resume’ you know;
To find a new job!
Let it be known that it was The Broder family
that reminded you that it was you who was;
The Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta, Canada on April 29, 2004!
Have you’re new employer call the Broder family for a reference.
Alison Redford / Attorney General
Craig Broder wrote to you on numerous occasions to inquire about an investigation into Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949 and you were not even aware that the investigation was Ordered by Justice Myra Bielby on April 29, 2004 at The Edmonton Law Courts;
Anyway; you’re response was consistent;
Alison Redford/ Attorney General
seeing how you told us that;
“neither you nor the Department of Justice can interfere with matters judicially decided by the courts“
I hope you don’t mind that we the accused
Donald Broder and Craig Broder
took matters into our own hands and performed our own investigation into
possible criminal charges that could be laid against;
“The Crown”
“Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta”
and also specific;
Justices of the court and the lawyers involved;
“for perjury, obstruction of justice or any other appropriate charges.”
“Don’t worry if you; Alison Redford cannot interfere with matters judicially decided by the courts”
We the accused;
Donald Broder and Craig Broder.
Will interfere if our own investigation
warrants a reason to do so.
Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta
You must have also had the Justice Department investigate,
Or did you?
Were not sure!
Hold on; lets see;
The Order to Investigate;
It really did not mean to Investigate.
Because they; The Crown;
Were aware Fraud was being committed by
Alberta Justices
Oh, got it;
It’s was a scare tactic to intimidate
The Innocent Broder Family!
***************************************
OK;
Alison Redford is gone
so wouldn’t you think it’s
The new Justice Minister
Kathleen Gangley’s
responsibility to;
Confirm the results of
The Investigation?
It’s understandable,
Alison Redford
must have been focused on
furthering your career and
not wasting her valuable time
performing an investigation
that was;
Ordered by the Courts.
“The Alberta Justice Department / Justice Myra Bielby
incarcerated Donald Broder at 75 years of age in a wheelchair on April 23, 2004.
An innocent senior citizen and made him a prisoner in
The Edmonton Remand Center for 11 days
sometimes in isolation and without necessary medical attention
then with involvement from his own family finally being fed cold pancakes and potatoes
until he followed the
Justice Myra Bielby’s Court Order,
So we the Canadian people expect that you;
Alison Redford
will first step down from being
Premier of Alberta;
” She resigned March 19, 2014!”
Write a formal apology to;
Donald H. Broder’s and family.
“we are sill waiting!”
Refund all their damages.
“we are still waiting!”
and
pledge to all Canadian’s for whom will all eventually be vulnerable
SENIOR CITIZENS
That the Canadian Governments will ensure all Canadians are protected by
The Canadian Constitution
and that
The Government of Alberta will ensure that;
All Senior Citizens of Alberta, Canada
will be allowed to live retirement in peace.
Safe guards legislated that protection will be provided to protect their net worth
and at the end of their life;
allowed to die with dignity!
THEN;
Alison Redford
voluntarily incarcerate yourself for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Centre
which should be sufficient time for you to purge you’re contempt of court and follow the;
COURT ORDER
that was issued on April 29, 2004 by the trial Judge;
Justice Myra Bielby!
for you to investigate and get judicially involved
************************************
At the same time you should criminally charge;
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen
with civil contempt for not following the
Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich
Court Order. “below”
That disappeared from the Court file at the Edmonton Law Court!
Glad you asked, how do we know that?
Here is the answer you have all been waiting for!
Donald Broder and Craig Broder attended the Clerk of the Courts office for the first time on the 14 day of November, 2008 by scheduled appointment to review the Court file.
It was at that time the Clerk of the Court provided Donald Broder and Craig Broder with a copy of the;
PROCEDURAL RECORD PRINT – ” below is page 6, dated 14/11/2008 at 15:07:07 “
showing – Order FILE CERT. Of RE – A.H. WACHOWICH – Date filed 05 MARCH 2001 – WB “Weir Bowen”
Liz completed articles of clerkship with a predecessor firm of Weir Bowen LLP (Newson Brumlik) in 1980. She is one of the founding partners of Weir Bowen. She has a general litigation practice, with an emphasis on matters involving insurance, personal injury, wrongful death, wills and estates, dependent adults, and commercial and real estate transactions.
She has extensive experience as counsel before the courts of Alberta (at trial and on appeal), and in negotiations, mediations and judicial dispute resolution of civil claims.
Liz has taught civil litigation at the Alberta Bar Admission Course and has made presentations and chaired a number of legal education seminars. Lawyers from other firms often refer cases to her.
Education:
1976 – Bachelor Arts (with distinction) – University of Alberta 1979 – Bachelor of Laws (with distinction) – University of Alberta
Bar Admission:
1980 – Law Society of Alberta
Professional Associations:
Edmonton Bar Association
The Revillon Building 500 | 10320 – 102 Avenue NW | Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4A1
SO IN RETURN
The Alberta Justice Department lead by
Past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore ” yes Liz MacInnis / Moore = her daddy”
colluded with
Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen
in ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen;
Donald H. Broder.
Continuation excerpts from Guy Lacourcieres cross-examination.
Page 28 / Line 6 to 17 –
A “As a matter of fact, it was told to the court of appeal. The comment was made by the court of appeal – – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis and we said, no, nobody was ambushed in respect to this. That matter was raised at the beginning in the statement of defence.”
Q “What do you mean by “ambushed Ms. MacInnis?”
A “The court had asked the question.
Q “If we ambushed Elizabeth MacInnis?”
A “It appears to us that Ms. MacInnis may have been ambushed by the motion, by Sawyers, in respect to – – in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”
Page 29 / Line 10 to 13 – A
“Let’s be clear. You filed a statement of defence. In the statement of defence it raised the issue of standing, okay?
Later on a comment was made, first of all, by Ms. MacInnis, that she had been ambushed.”
The first part of the investigation shall start with;
“Ms. MacInnis may have been ambushed by the motion, by Sawyers, … in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”
and
The second part of the investigation shall start with;
“The comment was made by the court of appeal – – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis”
But let it be known
“Later on a comment was made, first of all, by Ms. MacInnis, that she had been ambushed.”
Prelude to the first part of the investigation;
“in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen requests consent from Donald Broder and Craig Broder to accept and allow her to file;
The Amended Statement of Claim without Personal Representatives appointed by the surrogate courts obviously then not named as Plaintiff’s
and
The Certificate of Readiness to close the pleadings.
If Donald Broder or Craig Broder were trying to ambush Elizabeth MacInnis consent would nothave been declined.
Donald Broder and Craig Broder instructed Robert Sawers to deny consent.
So Elizabeth MacInnis file an application requesting a court order from Justice J. L. Jewis
to accept the Amended Statement of Claim and set a deadline to file the Certificate of Readiness and close the pleadings within this action.
It was heard by Justice J. L. Lewis on the 18 day of December, 2000 and the Order was granted.
THE
concluded that
Donald H. Broder a 75 year old senior while being falsley incarcerated at
The Edmonton RemandCenter
was defrauded by his own lawyer Guy Lacourciere
for ambushing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen
While all along and
as the evidence will prove it was
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that ambushed herself!
Then conspired with Donald H. Broder’s lawyers
to teach him a lesson by obtaining their own willful assistance to
collude and conspire to defraud Donald H. Broder for substantial legal fees and
then garnish his bank account of over $225,000.00
while working together to frame and falsely incarcerate this innocent senior citizen at
The Edmonton Remand Center.
from April 23 to May 5, 2004
Donald Broder and Craig Broder had just won the law suit as;
Elizabeth MacInnis just forced the Pleadings closed by way of Court order on herself before the Application for Probate to appoint Personal Representatives was applied for at The Surrogate Courts.
and
2. As of July 9, 1999 the two year limitation period lapsed to add or substitute new Plaintiff’s / The Personal Representatives from the original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997 as it was now December 18, 2000.
Donald Broder and Craig Broder had Robert Sawers make the Jury trial Application, we did not require a jury we had won but just prior to the Jury trial Application Robert Sawers filed a 129 Application, stating the action was frivolous, vexatious and abuse of court process as the Plaintiff’s lack standing in their personal capacity only
Case Law from; Newfoundland Supreme Court – Court of Appeal
Mugford vs. Mugford
Quote: Last page – last two paragraphs
The conclusion to be drawn is that the respondent, having no interest in the land, has no standing to bring an action. Although it was, as described by the trial judge, a dispute between Gordon Mugford and Ernest Mugford, it was a dispute over nothing. While Ernest Mugford may or may not have acquired possessory title or a statutory defence, it is the role of the administrator and not the role of Gordon Mugford to put this to the test.
The action was wrongly conceived for this reason, if for no other, and ought not to have proceeded, The appeal is allowed. The judgment of the trial judge is set aside. The appellant may have his costs both here and in the trial division.
GOODRIDGE C.J.N. – I concur O’NEILL J.A. – I concur CAMERON J.A.
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen was served with the Defendants 129 Application supported by the case-law Mugford vs. Mugfrod.
Page 28 and 29 of Guy Lacourciere cross-examination
“Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen “made the comment that she had been ambushed”
The Court Order below has never been followed to date, for which closed the pleadings on or before March 15, 2001.
Now that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen has lost the litigation the evidence will be provided to prove how a
conspiracy to orchestrate the outcome and ambush the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder
will be put into play by The Alberta Justice Department to
defraud, intimidate and falsely incarcerate these innocent Defendant’s
that did not know or try to ambush Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen
and it will be made clear by the evidence provided that we, Donald Broder and Craig Broder
were punished because Elizabeth MacInnis had ambushed herself.
Master W. J. Quinn was under
for ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.
Donald H. Broder
On April 27, 2001 Master W. J. Quinn hears the comment made by Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed
so he takes the liberty to adjourn the 129 application to keep the pleadings opened and allowing
Elizabeth MacInnis time to apply for probate and appoint Personal Representatives.
Excess of the two year limitation period has lapsed from the Original Statement of Claim filed date of July 8, 1997 and the Original Statement of Defence date of July 28, 1997
If we take it from the latter the original Statement of Defence file date of July 28, 1997 to the Master W. J. Quinn hearing date of April 27, 2001 excess of 3 1/2 years has lapsed.
Below is an excerpt from the Statute of Limitations Act.
Donald Broder and Craig Broder instruct Robert Sawers to appeal Master Quinns order and it is heard by
Justice C. P. Clarke
on September 18, 2001 now excess of 4 years from the Original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997.
Justice C. P. Clarke
also hears the comment made by Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed and
was aware the pleadings closed immediately following Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s 129 Application
so he takes the liberty to ambush the Defendant’s by ordering that;
“The Plaintiff’s have leave to file an Amended Amended Statement of Claim to add The Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s.”
Justice C. P. Clarkeis under
for adding new Plaintiff’s on September 18, 2001
excess of 4 years after the Original Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997
breaching the 2 year Statute of Limitation and acting biased and prejudiced by
Rocklake vs. Timberjack was heard by the Alberta Court of Appeal and supports the Statute of Limitation period of 2 years to add or substitute a new Plaintiff.
Below are the relevant excerpts and for those of you that would prefer to read the entire case law also available in PDF.
“The investigation was not wasted time and the website does not require ink!”
Hold on lets review the Justice Bielby Court Order !
Didn’t it say to turn transcripts over to the Attorney General!
“If you forgot Alison Redford that was you at the time!”
“with a request for an investigation for possible criminal charges that could be laid against
Don Broder and Craig Broder?”
Justice Myra Bielby was also under
for ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.
Donald H. Broder
Can you imagine
Justice Myra Bielby or is it because she is Honourable
she thought Donald Broder and Craig Broder would be
intimidate by her using her authoritative position as a scare tactic!
“Now that we know Alison Redford said; she cannot become judicially involved in matters decided by the courts”
Do you think;
Anything was ever turned over to
The Attorney General – Alison Redford for an investigation?
She is only
The Chief Legal Advisor!
Hold on again,
In paragraph 2 Justice Bielby’s order above it states;
2) The Defendant, Don Broder, is to be remanded in custody until he deposits the sale proceeds from the sale of the Trophy into the trust account of his Solicitors,Beresh Depoe Cunningham ……..
Oh, Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham was on retainer as Donald H. Broder’s criminal lawyer!
Then why did Guy Lacourciere get involved to obtain the money from Donald H. Broder wife Joyce Broder while
Donald H. Broder was in prison and then turned it over to
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen instead of Beresh Depoe Cunningham.
Answer:To stop the matter from going criminal!
Conspiracy to defraud
Guy Lacourciere clarified in the cross-examination Elizabeth MacInnis comment that she had been ambushed,
so it is alleged Guy Lacourciere was assisting with ambushing his own client Donald H. Broder!
Note:Guy Lacourciere had quit on Donald Broder and Craig Broder on October 30, 2003;
just 2.5 month prior to the scheduled trial date of January 19 – 23, 2004!
Guy Lacourciere admits in the cross-examination that he assisted the Broder’s by telephone during the trial!
You decide – “Was Guy Lacourciere assisting Donald H. Broder or was he really assisting Elizabeth MacInnis?”
See excerpts of the transcripts of page 40, 41, 42 and 43 of
Guy Lacourcieres cross-examination below.
Prelude to the second part of the investigation;
Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson was retained as defence council for Donald H. Broder shortly after Guy Lacourciere quit in October of 2003.
The first thing Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson did was Amend The Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004;
“Hold on that was not the first thing Bryan Kickham did;
The first thing he did was take a $15,000.00 retainer from an innocent senior citizen to prepare for trial!
so the second thing Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson did was;
Amend Donald H. Broder’s Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004.”
As the investigators from the Attorney Generals office should have asked themselves;
1)Why would Donald Broder’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson apply for and be granted by The Court a;
FIAT on January 9, 2004
FIAT means – “permission to amend The Statement of Defence”
then prepare and file an Amended Statement of Defence to
The Amended Amended Statement of Claim on January 9, 2004
just 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004
then back date the FIAT to January 9, 2003?
So why wouldn’t the trial Judge Justice Bielby see that;
Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson Amended The Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 just 10 days before the trial!
Because, this would prevent the trial Judge from seeing that the issue of lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the
The Original Statement of Defence !
Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson backdated the FIAT “permission to amend” to January 9, 2003
or as the evidence will prove the backdate was added in after the Judge signed then the same Judges second signature was forged ?
See the Amended Statement of Defence below!
Close up of the FIAT – “permission to amend”
Below is page 0011 of The Procedure Record Print provided to Donald Broder and Craig Broder by The Clerk of The Court at The Edmonton Law Courts on the
14 day of the 11 month of 2008 for which confirms the FIAT was granted by the Courts on
January 9, 2004!
Not on January 9, 2003!
During Donald H. Broder’s
evidence was discovered that proves;
Donald H. Brodere’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson conspire with
the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to
frame, orchestrate the false incarceration and ultimately defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.
Donald H. Broder
******************
Page 43 – lines 25 and 26 of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere
Q – Why would you file it?
A – Why would you file it?
Page 42 – lines 26 and 27of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere
Q – So the amended one takes precedence?
A – That’s correct.
Page 43 – line 1 and 2of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere
Q – Total precedence
A- Absolutely.
Was there an issue that was raised within the Original Statement of Defence that
Donald H. Broder’s lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson
was purposely concealing from the trial Judge Justice Bielby
to assist Elizabeth MacInnis Weir Bowen from ambushing herself?
Closing argument from the trial below!
Wait let’s ask Guy Lacourciere if the issue of lack of Personal Representatives was raised within
The Original Statement of Defence
and not in early 2001 as
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen
told the trial Judge Justice Bielby during the closing arguments.
So Craig Broder asked Guy Lacourciere the question see excerpts from The Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere page 28 below.
Now the
leads us to the criminal activity by the Crown!
“wait a minute now that the evidence proves The Crown participated in a criminal activity.”
I wonder if it is possible to have Alison Redford / The Attorney General / Chief Legal Advisor provide advise as to
who an innocent 75 year old senior citizen should call to have
The Crown lay criminal charges against The Crown!
“You gotta wonder who should Donald H. Broder have arrested!”
You mean to tell me that Guy Lacourciere showed The Alberta Court of Appeal Justices;
Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan
that Elizabeth MacInnis had committed perjury and they did nothing about it!
Hold on The Alberta Court of Appeal held up Justice Bielby’s decision and
dismissed Donald H. Broder’s contempt charge,
oh ya they also reduced his fine.
But refused to overturn the trial Judges decision
But wait a minute,
above on page 28 of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere
line 7 and 8
“The comment was made by the court of appeal _ _ well you ambushed Ms. MacInnis”
This seems like a job the FBI should be involved in after all The Alberta Justice Department and the lawyer’s involved participated in the conspiracy to defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen Donald H. Broder then held an auction at The Edmonton Law Courts and sold the extorted World Record Broder Buck for their own personal gain to an American citizen Don Shaufler in Montana for $225,000.00 US which converted to over $325,000.00 Cdn. all because Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore the daughter of Past Chief Justice of Alberta – W. Kenneth Moore made the comment she had been ambushed.
Donald H. Broder was under
for why the Application for Leave to
The Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed
as the evidence provided it was
Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham
that heard the comment about being ambushed made by;
Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen
so in return they conspired to
Orchestrate the Application for Leave to
The Supreme Court of Canada
and were successful in colluding to obtain the results of a
Dismissal.
So that lead to!
Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham being under
for allowing a senior citizen to be framed as he was
Donald H. Broder’s criminal lawyer retained to defend him while incarcerated on the orchestrated
false contempt of Court charge.
Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham is also under investigation for being retained by
Donald H. Broder to file the application for leave to
The Supreme Court of Canada
but also heard the comment by
Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed so the evidence below will prove that;
Marvin Bloos orchestrated the Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada
to cover up the criminal activity of all the Justices and lawyers involved
including himself.
” For all the documents we have discovered and disclosed from our investigation”
The above Table of Contents from The Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada has
provided the evidence to prove that criminal charges should be laid immediately against
Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham!
All that Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham included on behalf of his client;
Donald H. Broder in;
The Application for leave to;
The Supreme Court of Canada was;”
“The Original Statement of Defence!”
Review the full version purchased in PDF directly from
The Clerk of the Court at The Supreme Court of Canada
as it will provide the evidence to convict
Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham for;
Conspiracy to Defraud
his own client an innocent 75 year old senior citizen
Lets see what Calgary Law Courts said about a lawsuit against Marvin Bloos.
It Gets More Interesting Keep Reading!
David Letterman should use this one!
CBS – Late Night Top 10 Things to have on you’re bucket list if are a Defendant to a lawsuit in Alberta, Canada.
10) When a lawsuit is initiated against you and you know you are innocent, immediately sell everything you own and use the money to pay for a law degree for someone you trust like one of your children, grandchildren or yourself as they should graduate within plenty of time to represent you at the trial.
9) If you are a senior citizen you should immediately withdraw all your money from your savings account, inform all your pension providers to stop all automatic deposits and as soon as you receive your pension checks by mail or better yet have them picked up and cashed at Money Mart into coins then place all your coins in weather proof storage container and bury it in a secret location so there is no trace of you’re savings that can be garnished then there is a high probability the lawsuit would be discontinued as soon as you ask you’re lawyer to take an IOU.
8) The Alberta Justice Departmentallows a falseAffidavit of Service for Application for Probate to Appoint Personal Representatives that was sworn by the legal secretary of the Plaintiff’s lawyers that was based on a note to file the Defendant’s lawyer had confirmed he had received a copy for information purposes is contradicted by an Affidavit from the Defendant’s lawyer that he did not accept service on behalf of the Defendant because the pleadings were closed within the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench action for which he was on retainer as defence counsel.
7) When you are scheduled for court bring extra batteries as the RCMP told us that the batteries might of died in the microphone causing the audio recording device to be selective on what was recorded during the trial at The Edmonton Law Courts; deliberately missing the opening statements read on behalf of the Defendant, Donald Broder during the opening ceremony of the orchestrated trial on January 19, 2004.
6) The Statute of Limitations of 2 years to add or substitute new Plaintiff’s to a Statement of Claim does not apply to the Plaintiff’s lawyer because her father The Chief Justice of Alberta heard his daughter comment about being ambushed by the Defendant’s lawyer so The Alberta Justice Department thought it only appropriate to ambush the innocent 75 year old senior citizen that did not even know or try to ambushed anyone.
5) When you have been served with a Statement of Claim make sure as a Defendant you research the family tree of the Plaintiff’s lawyer and if her father is the Chief Justice of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench tell your lawyer not to let her ambush herself.
4) When the Defendant’s lawyer quits 3 months before the trial it’s because you do not need a lawyer to win as long as the Original Statement of Defence that raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives and The Statement of Defence to The Amended Amended Statement of Claim the plead estoppel is not Amended to conceal the Original Statement of Defence from the trial Judge for which would orchestrate the outcome in favor of the Plaintiff’s lawyer and if you still lose you will have nobody to blame but yourself because as the Alberta Law Courts have stated you can’t sue the lawyer that won even if she committed fraud to win, but you can write the trial judge to have the decision reversed then she will have lost so now you can sue her.
3) When your lawyer quits 3 months before the trial and you retain another lawyer for whom accepts a fifteen thousand dollar retainer to prepare for trial waits for the check to clear then makes an application before the Edmonton Law Courts for a FIAT on January 9, 2004, “permission to amend your Statement of Defence” backdates the FIAT to January 9 2003 then when your new lawyer calls to tell you that you are going to lose and he is told you do not need him to lose and fire him immediately you hear panic in his voice as if he got caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Then a few days later you receive a phone call from someone pretending to be a lawyer from the Fifth Estate asking lots of questions you should be aware the lawyers involved are in panic mode trying to figure out if you know what they are up to.
2)Always presume you are guilty until proven innocent because the Alberta Justice Department will orchestrate your guilty verdict even if they know you are innocent.
1) As an innocent senior citizens prepare yourself by reading Company’s Coming cook books for ideas on how to make survival soup from a ketchup package and cold water which will be enough because your not expecting company for dinner while incarcerated in isolation at The Edmonton Remand Center for not following a 2004 court order, while the Attorney General of Alberta, Alison Redford takes years to initiate the investigation ordered by the courts that will prove you were innocent and that it was the Plaintiff’s lawyer that did not follow an earlier 2001 court order granted by the new Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich for whom replaced the Plaintiff’s lawyers father past chief Justice of Alberta W. Kenneth Moore.
To all the willful participants, that is Justices and lawyers named for whom all conspired to defraud two innocent 75 year old senior citizens we have reported this crime to the authorities and report that Joyce M. Broder was persecuted and defrauded of her retirement pension with garnishes imposed at her bank account at the Alberta Treasury Branch in Sundre, Alberta while she succumbed to complication from Dementia and Alzheimer.
On the morning of September 23, 2011 Joyce M. Broder was rushed from the Good Samaritans Care Center in Stoney Plain, Alberta
to the local hospital where she passed away later that day.
Donald H. Broder and Craig Broder were ordered to be in Court in Calgary the morning of September 23, 2011 being threatened once again with contempt of Court for not filling out form 13 of the civil enforcement act declaring and listing everything they own and received the call from family upon leaving the Calgary Court Center being informed of the situation.
Donald H. Broder made all efforts to be with his wife but she passed away before he could get there.
Donald H. Broder was an honest and sincere man being driven to expose the dishonesty of lawyers and Judges.
He not only exposed the corruption within the Alberta Justice Department, Justices and lawyers to the world, he did it for you the reader.
Donald H. Broder stood for democracy and freedom for all.
One of verbal life lessons he instilled on his children was;
” I never got into trouble until I hired a lawyer and never got out of trouble until I fired the son of a *****!”
Donald H. Broder succumbed to complications from a heart valve replacement finally causing kidney failure
and passed away on April 11, 2012.
To Alison Redford for whom has allowed all the Justices, lawyers and law firms named within the
Alberta Justice System for whom all played roles to orchestrated a
Conspiracy to Defraud innocent senior citizen’s;
Donald H. Broder while he was caring for his wife Joyce M Broder for whom was suffering with Alzheimer’s;
Let it be known that is
one too many!
We ask the Canadian people;
Now that you have been made aware of
The REDFORD FILES
Is Alison Redford a Hypocrite ?
Webster Definition; – hyp-o-crite – one who affects virtues or qualities he or she does not have.
Exposure has conclude
Mandela’s funeral
Alberta Premier Alison Redford in Vancouver on Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012. (Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Share:
The Canadian Press Published Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:37PM EST Last Updated Wednesday, February 5, 2014 3:44PM EST
OKOTOKS, Alta. — Alberta’s premier says it’s unacceptable that it cost taxpayers $45,000 for her to attend Nelson Mandela’s funeral and she wouldn’t have gone had she known the price tag.
Redford, who once worked with Mandela before she entered politics, was invited to travel with Prime Minister Stephen Harper as part of a Canadian delegation attending the former South African leader’s funeral in December. The premier’s office confirmed she travelled with an assistant.
“I’m not challenging the number. I’m surprised by the number,” she said Wednesday after making an education announcement south of Calgary. “I don’t think it was acceptable. I was disappointed. You can appreciate that it was a very fluid week and you can appreciate I’m not making my own travel arrangements in those circumstances.”
Redford took a provincial government plane to Ottawa to catch the free flight with Harper to South Africa, but she flew home early on a commercial flight at a cost of $10,000 to attend the swearing-in of her new cabinet.
“I have to say that if, at that point of time, we had understood … what some of those actual costs were going to turn out to be, and also how fluid the prime minister’s schedule was, I think I would have chosen not to go,” Redford said.
Opposition leaders have noted that Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil billed taxpayers less than $1,000 to go to the funeral.
They say Redford’s lavish spending on travel abroad shows contempt for taxpayers.
Wildrose critic Rob Anderson said Wednesday that Redford ought to have known the cost of her trip, or at least could’ve taken a good guess.
“One might ask how the premier didn’t know taking a private jet to Ottawa wouldn’t be expensive,” said Anderson, who added that Redford needs to pay the money back.
He said the trip, along with Redford’s recent $120,000 journey to India and Switzerland, suggests she has delusions of royalty.
“She obviously thinks she’s the Queen of England. There’s some kind of an identity crisis going on here. She’s not. She’s the premier of Alberta,” he said. “She needs to start showing respect for the taxpayers that she represents and spends the money from.”
Redford has also been criticized since the release of her government’s list of public-sector employees who make more than $100,000 a year,
Redford’s chief of staff, Farouk Adatia, led the way on the political side, pulling in more than $357,000 in salary and benefits in 2013.
Peter Watson, the top civil servant who works for Redford’s cabinet, was the top money-earner among mandarins at $342,000 in base salary.
The numbers showed that deputy ministers — the top civil servants in each department — earned salaries ranging in the low $200,000s to just over $300,000.
“Quite frankly it is important to compensate people appropriately. I’m not going to get into negotiating or discussing individual contracts,” Redford said .
“It’s a very competitive economy in Alberta. People are well compensated. Many of the people who work in the government of Alberta are paid more than in other jurisdictions across the country and that will continue.”
CHEap OaklEyS - CHEap OaklEyS... What's up, all is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that truly fine, keep…
the full report - Makes Persuasive Presentations... Thank you for sharing with us, I believe this website genuinely stands out :D.... [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The…
DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP
Direct Contact: (780) 424-2030 emacinnis@weirbowen.com
No comments
Trackbacks/Pingbacks